Today's Article
Americans are being
asked to spend almost
a trillion dollars,
without precisely
knowing how that
money is going to be
spent.
asked to spend almost
a trillion dollars,
without precisely
knowing how that
money is going to be
spent.
The American Spark
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Lobbyists May Still Influence Obama Stimulus Plan
By Cliff Montgomery - Feb. 2nd, 2009
President Barack Obama may have banned earmarks in his $825 billion economic stimulus package, but
lobbyists, lawmakers and interest groups will still be allowed to funnel tax dollars to pet projects.
This is not to suggest that either Obama's stimulus plan, or his attempt to stem the undue influence of money
over politics, is a poor idea; in fact, each is an essential measure.
But under the current Obama stimulus bill, dollars will partly be apportioned according to the endorsements of
administration officials--as well as through the say of various state and local powers--and partly through arcane
formulas that the bill spells out, according to The Associated Press (AP).
Such a funding process makes it much harder for citizens to determine exactly who is getting the money, and
may inadvertently make the act of government funding even more secretive than it is now.
Thus "there is a challenge now that projects will be added behind closed doors without a paper trail," stated
Keith Ashdown, an official working for the government watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense.
Or to state it more clearly: Americans are being asked to spend almost a trillion dollars, without precisely
knowing how that money is going to be spent.
Lawmakers previously had directly added legislative language to a bill which set aside dollars for particular
projects. That procedure, known as earmarking, was banned from the stimulus package by Obama and
Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill.
The funds instead mainly will be allocated according to obscure formulas discussed in the legislation. In a
number of other cases, projects for funding will be chosen by Obama administrators, governors and a spate of
state and local officials.
"Somebody's going to earmark it somewhere," consultant Howard Marlowe told AP. Marlowe works for a
coalition trying to preserve beaches.
Though the earmark ban does appear to have made it harder for lobbyists to nab some of those stimulus
dollars for their clients, the new rules also ensure that any successful lobbying is being done indirectly--thus
making a number of such actions impossible to track.
Obama of course campaigned on promises to create a more accountable and transparent federal
government. And to be fair, the president has pushed for a system that will, in time, allow citizens to track
precisely where stimulus dollars are going via an Internet-accessed search engine. Democratic lawmakers also
have devised a stringent oversight system, which will create a special board to oversee how the economic
stimulus money is being spent.
The problem with such fine measures? None of them will be instituted until after the stimulus package
becomes law.
Obama's stimulus plan and his desire to clean up Washington are much-needed measures--they probably are
the main reasons he was elected to the presidency last November.
But it's hard for citizens to back such a massive stimulus bill when they have no clear means of knowing how
their taxpayer dollars are being invested.
Like what you're reading so far? Then why not order a full year (52 issues) of the The American Spark
e-newsletter for only $15? A major article covering an story not being told in the Corporate Press will be
delivered to your email every Monday morning for a full year, for less than 30 cents an issue. Order Now!
By Cliff Montgomery - Feb. 2nd, 2009
President Barack Obama may have banned earmarks in his $825 billion economic stimulus package, but
lobbyists, lawmakers and interest groups will still be allowed to funnel tax dollars to pet projects.
This is not to suggest that either Obama's stimulus plan, or his attempt to stem the undue influence of money
over politics, is a poor idea; in fact, each is an essential measure.
But under the current Obama stimulus bill, dollars will partly be apportioned according to the endorsements of
administration officials--as well as through the say of various state and local powers--and partly through arcane
formulas that the bill spells out, according to The Associated Press (AP).
Such a funding process makes it much harder for citizens to determine exactly who is getting the money, and
may inadvertently make the act of government funding even more secretive than it is now.
Thus "there is a challenge now that projects will be added behind closed doors without a paper trail," stated
Keith Ashdown, an official working for the government watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense.
Or to state it more clearly: Americans are being asked to spend almost a trillion dollars, without precisely
knowing how that money is going to be spent.
Lawmakers previously had directly added legislative language to a bill which set aside dollars for particular
projects. That procedure, known as earmarking, was banned from the stimulus package by Obama and
Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill.
The funds instead mainly will be allocated according to obscure formulas discussed in the legislation. In a
number of other cases, projects for funding will be chosen by Obama administrators, governors and a spate of
state and local officials.
"Somebody's going to earmark it somewhere," consultant Howard Marlowe told AP. Marlowe works for a
coalition trying to preserve beaches.
Though the earmark ban does appear to have made it harder for lobbyists to nab some of those stimulus
dollars for their clients, the new rules also ensure that any successful lobbying is being done indirectly--thus
making a number of such actions impossible to track.
Obama of course campaigned on promises to create a more accountable and transparent federal
government. And to be fair, the president has pushed for a system that will, in time, allow citizens to track
precisely where stimulus dollars are going via an Internet-accessed search engine. Democratic lawmakers also
have devised a stringent oversight system, which will create a special board to oversee how the economic
stimulus money is being spent.
The problem with such fine measures? None of them will be instituted until after the stimulus package
becomes law.
Obama's stimulus plan and his desire to clean up Washington are much-needed measures--they probably are
the main reasons he was elected to the presidency last November.
But it's hard for citizens to back such a massive stimulus bill when they have no clear means of knowing how
their taxpayer dollars are being invested.
Like what you're reading so far? Then why not order a full year (52 issues) of the The American Spark
e-newsletter for only $15? A major article covering an story not being told in the Corporate Press will be
delivered to your email every Monday morning for a full year, for less than 30 cents an issue. Order Now!
Wait, why does an
independent news source
run advertisements? The
Spark answers in its
advertising policy.
independent news source
run advertisements? The
Spark answers in its
advertising policy.
* Please check out our ads--they
help keep this news site running.
Thanks!
help keep this news site running.
Thanks!