Today's Article
Many asset
managers of bailout
funds have direct
financial ties to the
toxic assets which
caused the financial
meltdown.
managers of bailout
funds have direct
financial ties to the
toxic assets which
caused the financial
meltdown.
The American Spark
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Conflicts Of Interest May Control Bank Bailout
By Cliff Montgomery - June 4th, 2009
Billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars are being spent to bail out Wall Street tycoons. Thus it's perhaps
understandable that the feds would hire private asset managers to oversee these complex, massive
expenditures.
But many asset managers hired by the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department have a direct financial
tie to the same kind of toxic assets that they are evaluating for the government, says a major independent
watchdog group.
The Project On Government Oversight (POGO) on May 19th sent a letter to the congressional panels directing
the bailout, informing them of the "the serious potential for conflicts of interest."
"It’s perfectly understandable that the [U.S.] government is relying on the expertise of these private fund
managers to assist with the complex tasks of asset management and valuation," stated the May letter.
"[But] POGO is concerned," continued the letter,"...about the conflicts of interest that could arise if these fund
managers are also investing in the same types of assets for their private clients."
"These conflicts of interest could have a wide range of consequences," stated the letter, "including financial
losses for the American taxpayer, an unfair competitive advantage for the fund managers," said POGO, "and
the continued erosion of public confidence in the government’s ability to stabilize the financial system."
For instance, Bloomberg News in March reported that Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO) had
advised the federal government on the value of $118 billion in assets guaranteed by the bailout of Bank of
America Corporation. These assets included securities backed by commercial and residential loans.
The problem? PIMCO also had been investing in mortgage-backed securities for a number of private clients--
as of March 31st of this year, the company's mortgage-backed securities fund held about $967 million of such
bad assets.
Even some congresspeople have acknowledged this apparent conflict. Representative Scott Garrett (R-NJ)
aptly described PIMCO’s potential conflict of interest.
“PIMCO and others potentially have two masters to serve: the U.S. taxpayer and their own fiduciary obligations
to clients,” Garrett told Bloomberg in March.
The matter became such a political issue that Bank of America decided to decline the PIMCO arrangement. All
the same, it reveals the apparent conflicts of interest in the government's current Wall Street bailout.
The federal government "should be collecting much more information from these asset managers before
concluding that taxpayers are adequately protected from conflicts of interest," stated a May press release from
POGO which announced its letter to Congress.
However, "it appears that the Fed and Treasury are mostly relying on the asset managers for self-disclosure,"
continued the release.
"POGO believes Congress should be demanding the Fed and Treasury take a more proactive role in protecting
the interests of the American taxpayer," the release added.
The POGO letter was sent to four congressional committees: the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking,
Housing, and Urban Affairs; the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance; the U.S. House Committee on Financial
Services; and the U.S. Joint Economic Committee.
Like what you're reading so far? Then why not order a full year (52 issues) of the The American Spark e-
newsletter for only $15? A major article covering an story not being told in the Corporate Press will be
delivered to your email every Monday morning for a full year, for less than 30 cents an issue. Order Now!
By Cliff Montgomery - June 4th, 2009
Billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars are being spent to bail out Wall Street tycoons. Thus it's perhaps
understandable that the feds would hire private asset managers to oversee these complex, massive
expenditures.
But many asset managers hired by the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department have a direct financial
tie to the same kind of toxic assets that they are evaluating for the government, says a major independent
watchdog group.
The Project On Government Oversight (POGO) on May 19th sent a letter to the congressional panels directing
the bailout, informing them of the "the serious potential for conflicts of interest."
"It’s perfectly understandable that the [U.S.] government is relying on the expertise of these private fund
managers to assist with the complex tasks of asset management and valuation," stated the May letter.
"[But] POGO is concerned," continued the letter,"...about the conflicts of interest that could arise if these fund
managers are also investing in the same types of assets for their private clients."
"These conflicts of interest could have a wide range of consequences," stated the letter, "including financial
losses for the American taxpayer, an unfair competitive advantage for the fund managers," said POGO, "and
the continued erosion of public confidence in the government’s ability to stabilize the financial system."
For instance, Bloomberg News in March reported that Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO) had
advised the federal government on the value of $118 billion in assets guaranteed by the bailout of Bank of
America Corporation. These assets included securities backed by commercial and residential loans.
The problem? PIMCO also had been investing in mortgage-backed securities for a number of private clients--
as of March 31st of this year, the company's mortgage-backed securities fund held about $967 million of such
bad assets.
Even some congresspeople have acknowledged this apparent conflict. Representative Scott Garrett (R-NJ)
aptly described PIMCO’s potential conflict of interest.
“PIMCO and others potentially have two masters to serve: the U.S. taxpayer and their own fiduciary obligations
to clients,” Garrett told Bloomberg in March.
The matter became such a political issue that Bank of America decided to decline the PIMCO arrangement. All
the same, it reveals the apparent conflicts of interest in the government's current Wall Street bailout.
The federal government "should be collecting much more information from these asset managers before
concluding that taxpayers are adequately protected from conflicts of interest," stated a May press release from
POGO which announced its letter to Congress.
However, "it appears that the Fed and Treasury are mostly relying on the asset managers for self-disclosure,"
continued the release.
"POGO believes Congress should be demanding the Fed and Treasury take a more proactive role in protecting
the interests of the American taxpayer," the release added.
The POGO letter was sent to four congressional committees: the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking,
Housing, and Urban Affairs; the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance; the U.S. House Committee on Financial
Services; and the U.S. Joint Economic Committee.
Like what you're reading so far? Then why not order a full year (52 issues) of the The American Spark e-
newsletter for only $15? A major article covering an story not being told in the Corporate Press will be
delivered to your email every Monday morning for a full year, for less than 30 cents an issue. Order Now!
Wait, why does an
independent news source
run advertisements? The
Spark answers in its
advertising policy.
independent news source
run advertisements? The
Spark answers in its
advertising policy.
* Please check out our ads--they
help keep this news site running.
Thanks!
help keep this news site running.
Thanks!