Today's Article
A top arms control
expert called
Wednesday for an
immediate ban on the
use of gene therapy
and other life sciences
for military purposes.
expert called
Wednesday for an
immediate ban on the
use of gene therapy
and other life sciences
for military purposes.
The American Spark
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Gene Therapy, Other Life Sciences May Be Used For Military
Purposes
By Cliff Montgomery - Aug 21st, 2009
A top biological and chemical arms control expert called Wednesday for an immediate ban on the use of gene
therapy and other life sciences for military purposes.
British academic Malcolm Dando wrote in the American journal Nature that non-military researchers in several
countries largely appear unaware of the hazard. Dando added that lawmakers should quickly make changes to
a leading arms pact to avoid a crisis.
"In the past 20 years, modern warfare has changed from predominantly large-scale clashes of armies to messy
civil strife," Dando wrote in Nature. He cited the 90's Bosnian War and the ongoing conflicts in Afghanistan and
Iraq as prime examples.
Non-military life sciences in recent years have made great strides in everything from chemicals to gene therapy.
But such scientific discoveries also "are particularly suited to this style of warfare; [hence] it is not hard to find
people in the military world who think they would be useful" in battle, he stated.
Dando does not strike one as the alarmist type. He is Professor of International Security at Britain's Bradford
University. Dando also regularly participates in U.N.-sponsored arms discussions; next week he will be in
Geneva to participate in a top-level meeting on a 1972 biological weapons agreement.
And as the professor writes in Nature, an interest in the possible military use of life science discoveries has
been around for a while.
"In 1959, the chairman of the UK government's secret Chemistry Committee of the Advisory Council on
Scientific Research and Technical Development told his colleagues that the committee was 'looking for agents
which would produce, not cure, psychoses'. "
"Between the early 1950s and 1970s, researchers working in laboratories that eventually became the US Army
Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense studied chemical agents that affect the central nervous
system," continued the professor in Nature.
"Indeed in 1961, the US military weaponized BZ — a drug that had originally been studied as a possible
therapy for gastrointestinal diseases," wrote Dando.
"BZ is one of a group of chemicals that act on the brain and can cause delirium; people exposed to it may fall
into a stupor, struggle to speak, show poor coordination and have difficulty processing thoughts," he added.
The professor wrote in Nature that such misuses of life science discoveries may be outlawed by making
changes to the global Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), created in 1993.
"The CWC urgently needs modifying if it is to continue to help ensure that the modern life sciences are not
used for hostile purposes," wrote Dando.
The top issue may be how the CWC deals with non-lethal chemicals employed by law enforcement.
Currently the agreement, which has been signed by 188 countries, bans the use of all chemical weapons--that
is, all except those used for riot control and law enforcement.
"'Law enforcement' could be taken by some to cover more than domestic riot control, which in certain
circumstances would make it legal for the military to use agents such as fentanyl," Dando stated, referring to a
strong painkilling drug.
Fentanyl, a powerful painkiller, was the basic ingredient of a still-undisclosed concoction used by Russian
special military forces in 2002 to weaken Chechen rebels who had taken over a crowded Moscow theater,
according to Dando.
Dousing the theater with the mixture did allow Russian commandos in protective gear to break in and shoot
dead the incapacitated hostage-takers. But the concoction also killed more than 120 hostages, including one
American.
An agent currently being developed is oxytocin, which has been dubbed the "love and cuddle" drug. The
chemical, which induces a deep sense of trust, "opens up the possibility of a drug that could be used to
manipulate people's emotions in a military context," wrote Dando.
Some who back the military use of gene therapy and other life sciences argue that such a deployment may
lessen the number of people killed in battles. But Dando counters that real-life applications, like the use of
fentanyl to end the Moscow theater siege, prove this is not so.
The professor declared a sense of alarm at the apparent lack of concern many life scientists currently show for
this issue.
"They are just not taking the problem on board," Dando recently told Reuters.
The professor also said it was unlikely that needed changes to the CWC could be made by 2013, when the
agreement again comes up for review.
"It is a long diplomatic process and it is not clear that even governments fully recognize the problem," the
professor told Reuters during a telephone interview.
Like what you're reading so far? Then why not order a full year (52 issues) of the The American Spark e-
newsletter for only $15? A major article covering an story not being told in the Corporate Press will be
delivered to your email every Monday morning for a full year, for less than 30 cents an issue. Order Now!
Purposes
By Cliff Montgomery - Aug 21st, 2009
A top biological and chemical arms control expert called Wednesday for an immediate ban on the use of gene
therapy and other life sciences for military purposes.
British academic Malcolm Dando wrote in the American journal Nature that non-military researchers in several
countries largely appear unaware of the hazard. Dando added that lawmakers should quickly make changes to
a leading arms pact to avoid a crisis.
"In the past 20 years, modern warfare has changed from predominantly large-scale clashes of armies to messy
civil strife," Dando wrote in Nature. He cited the 90's Bosnian War and the ongoing conflicts in Afghanistan and
Iraq as prime examples.
Non-military life sciences in recent years have made great strides in everything from chemicals to gene therapy.
But such scientific discoveries also "are particularly suited to this style of warfare; [hence] it is not hard to find
people in the military world who think they would be useful" in battle, he stated.
Dando does not strike one as the alarmist type. He is Professor of International Security at Britain's Bradford
University. Dando also regularly participates in U.N.-sponsored arms discussions; next week he will be in
Geneva to participate in a top-level meeting on a 1972 biological weapons agreement.
And as the professor writes in Nature, an interest in the possible military use of life science discoveries has
been around for a while.
"In 1959, the chairman of the UK government's secret Chemistry Committee of the Advisory Council on
Scientific Research and Technical Development told his colleagues that the committee was 'looking for agents
which would produce, not cure, psychoses'. "
"Between the early 1950s and 1970s, researchers working in laboratories that eventually became the US Army
Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense studied chemical agents that affect the central nervous
system," continued the professor in Nature.
"Indeed in 1961, the US military weaponized BZ — a drug that had originally been studied as a possible
therapy for gastrointestinal diseases," wrote Dando.
"BZ is one of a group of chemicals that act on the brain and can cause delirium; people exposed to it may fall
into a stupor, struggle to speak, show poor coordination and have difficulty processing thoughts," he added.
The professor wrote in Nature that such misuses of life science discoveries may be outlawed by making
changes to the global Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), created in 1993.
"The CWC urgently needs modifying if it is to continue to help ensure that the modern life sciences are not
used for hostile purposes," wrote Dando.
The top issue may be how the CWC deals with non-lethal chemicals employed by law enforcement.
Currently the agreement, which has been signed by 188 countries, bans the use of all chemical weapons--that
is, all except those used for riot control and law enforcement.
"'Law enforcement' could be taken by some to cover more than domestic riot control, which in certain
circumstances would make it legal for the military to use agents such as fentanyl," Dando stated, referring to a
strong painkilling drug.
Fentanyl, a powerful painkiller, was the basic ingredient of a still-undisclosed concoction used by Russian
special military forces in 2002 to weaken Chechen rebels who had taken over a crowded Moscow theater,
according to Dando.
Dousing the theater with the mixture did allow Russian commandos in protective gear to break in and shoot
dead the incapacitated hostage-takers. But the concoction also killed more than 120 hostages, including one
American.
An agent currently being developed is oxytocin, which has been dubbed the "love and cuddle" drug. The
chemical, which induces a deep sense of trust, "opens up the possibility of a drug that could be used to
manipulate people's emotions in a military context," wrote Dando.
Some who back the military use of gene therapy and other life sciences argue that such a deployment may
lessen the number of people killed in battles. But Dando counters that real-life applications, like the use of
fentanyl to end the Moscow theater siege, prove this is not so.
The professor declared a sense of alarm at the apparent lack of concern many life scientists currently show for
this issue.
"They are just not taking the problem on board," Dando recently told Reuters.
The professor also said it was unlikely that needed changes to the CWC could be made by 2013, when the
agreement again comes up for review.
"It is a long diplomatic process and it is not clear that even governments fully recognize the problem," the
professor told Reuters during a telephone interview.
Like what you're reading so far? Then why not order a full year (52 issues) of the The American Spark e-
newsletter for only $15? A major article covering an story not being told in the Corporate Press will be
delivered to your email every Monday morning for a full year, for less than 30 cents an issue. Order Now!
Wait, why does an
independent news source
run advertisements? The
Spark answers in its
advertising policy.
independent news source
run advertisements? The
Spark answers in its
advertising policy.
* Please check out our ads--they
help keep this news site running.
Thanks!
help keep this news site running.
Thanks!