Today's Article
The Senate Judiciary
Committee is
considering only small
tweaks to the Act,
while still extending
the authorization of
three expiring
provisions.
Committee is
considering only small
tweaks to the Act,
while still extending
the authorization of
three expiring
provisions.
The American Spark
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
'Anti-Patriot' Surveillance Provisions Up For Renewal
By Cliff Montgomery - Oct. 5th, 2009
The Senate Judiciary Committee last week began its debate of legislation intended to extend three provisions
of the Bush-era Anti-Patriot Act which are set to expire on December 31st. The bill also will add some minor
tweaks to other over-reaching surveillance stipulations of the act.
Such matters make this bill very important business.
"Despite the many amendments to [such laws as the Anti-Patriot Act] since 9/11," declares the American Civil
Liberties Union (ACLU) on its website, "Congress and the public have yet to receive real information about how
these powerful tools are being used to collect information on Americans, and how that information is being
used."
"These laws work together to create a surveillance superstructure--and Congress must understand how it
really works to create meaningful protections for civil liberties," adds the ACLU.
Committee members Russ Feingold (D-WI) and Richard Durbin (D-IL) introduced legislation called the
JUSTICE Act. The JUSTICE Act would restore many of our civil liberties, which all too often were trampled by
such post-9/11 surveillance laws as the Anti-Patriot Act.
The Feingold-Durbin legislation not only reverses many of the suppressions of civil liberties found in the Anti-
Patriot Act, but it also amends the equally-destructive FISA Amendments Act and other surveillance laws. If
passed, the JUSTICE Act will go a long way to bringing these laws into line with the U.S. Constitution.
On Sept. 17th, the Feingold-Durbin bill was read twice and referred to the committee. That is a bill's first small
step to possibly becoming law.
But those planning to see this bill approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee--or see the panel produce any
legitimate restoration of our privacy rights--probably should think again.
The Senate panel initially looked at Chairman Patrick Leahy’s (D-VT) Sunset Extension Act, which would
provide much smaller fixes to the Anti-Patriot Act while still extending the authorization of the three expiring
provisions.
The committee decided to substitute Leahy’s bill with similar, more conservative legislation he's co-sponsored
with Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA). The Leahy-Feinstein bill provides only tiny modifications to the Anti-Patriot
Act.
At least the Senate panel accepted a Feingold amendment which would shorten the time period of the Act's
"sneak and peek" provision--a stipulation which allows law enforcement officials to postpone giving notice
when they conduct a search.
A Durbin amendment to limit powers which allow the federal government to secure access to "any tangible
thing," was rejected.
Like what you're reading so far? Then why not order a full year (52 issues) of the The American Spark e-
newsletter for only $15? A major article covering an story not being told in the Corporate Press will be
delivered to your email every Monday morning for a full year, for less than 30 cents an issue. Order Now!
By Cliff Montgomery - Oct. 5th, 2009
The Senate Judiciary Committee last week began its debate of legislation intended to extend three provisions
of the Bush-era Anti-Patriot Act which are set to expire on December 31st. The bill also will add some minor
tweaks to other over-reaching surveillance stipulations of the act.
Such matters make this bill very important business.
"Despite the many amendments to [such laws as the Anti-Patriot Act] since 9/11," declares the American Civil
Liberties Union (ACLU) on its website, "Congress and the public have yet to receive real information about how
these powerful tools are being used to collect information on Americans, and how that information is being
used."
"These laws work together to create a surveillance superstructure--and Congress must understand how it
really works to create meaningful protections for civil liberties," adds the ACLU.
Committee members Russ Feingold (D-WI) and Richard Durbin (D-IL) introduced legislation called the
JUSTICE Act. The JUSTICE Act would restore many of our civil liberties, which all too often were trampled by
such post-9/11 surveillance laws as the Anti-Patriot Act.
The Feingold-Durbin legislation not only reverses many of the suppressions of civil liberties found in the Anti-
Patriot Act, but it also amends the equally-destructive FISA Amendments Act and other surveillance laws. If
passed, the JUSTICE Act will go a long way to bringing these laws into line with the U.S. Constitution.
On Sept. 17th, the Feingold-Durbin bill was read twice and referred to the committee. That is a bill's first small
step to possibly becoming law.
But those planning to see this bill approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee--or see the panel produce any
legitimate restoration of our privacy rights--probably should think again.
The Senate panel initially looked at Chairman Patrick Leahy’s (D-VT) Sunset Extension Act, which would
provide much smaller fixes to the Anti-Patriot Act while still extending the authorization of the three expiring
provisions.
The committee decided to substitute Leahy’s bill with similar, more conservative legislation he's co-sponsored
with Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA). The Leahy-Feinstein bill provides only tiny modifications to the Anti-Patriot
Act.
At least the Senate panel accepted a Feingold amendment which would shorten the time period of the Act's
"sneak and peek" provision--a stipulation which allows law enforcement officials to postpone giving notice
when they conduct a search.
A Durbin amendment to limit powers which allow the federal government to secure access to "any tangible
thing," was rejected.
Like what you're reading so far? Then why not order a full year (52 issues) of the The American Spark e-
newsletter for only $15? A major article covering an story not being told in the Corporate Press will be
delivered to your email every Monday morning for a full year, for less than 30 cents an issue. Order Now!
Wait, why does an
independent news source
run advertisements? The
Spark answers in its
advertising policy.
independent news source
run advertisements? The
Spark answers in its
advertising policy.
* Please check out our ads--they
help keep this news site running.
Thanks!
help keep this news site running.
Thanks!