Today's Article
'H.R. 3962 would put
the government in the
role of accelerating
the privatization of
health care,' says
Rep. Dennis Kucinich
(D-OH).
the government in the
role of accelerating
the privatization of
health care,' says
Rep. Dennis Kucinich
(D-OH).
The American Spark
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Health Care Bill Is Insurance 'Bailout Under A Blue Cross,' Says
Kucinich
By Cliff Montgomery - Nov. 9th, 2009
The U.S. House of Representatives late Saturday narrowly passed a massive overhaul of America's health
insurance system.
The Washington Post breathlessly hailed the legislation--called H.R. 3962 on Capitol Hill--as something
which "seeks to...guarantee comprehensive and affordable coverage to almost every American."
But many House members disagree with that assessment--and not all of them are conservatives.
U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) proudly voted against the House proposal. Yesterday, Kucinich
issued a passionate argument for his decision, which all Americans should consider.
The American Spark below offers major portions of Rep. Kucinich's statement:
"We have been led to believe that we must make our health care choices only within the current structure of a
predatory, for-profit insurance system which makes money [by] not providing health care. [...] When health
insurance companies deny care or raise premiums, co-pays and deductibles they are simply trying to make a
profit. That is our system.
"Clearly, the insurance companies are the problem, not the solution. They are driving up the cost of health care.
[...]
"But instead of working toward the elimination of for-profit insurance, H.R. 3962 would put the government in the
role of accelerating the privatization of health care.
"In H.R. 3962, the government is requiring at least 21 million Americans to buy private health insurance from the
very industry that causes costs to be so high, which will result in at least $70 billion in new annual revenue, much
of which is coming from taxpayers.
"This inevitably will lead to even more costs, more subsidies, and higher profits for insurance companies--a
bailout under a blue cross.
"By incurring only a new requirement to cover pre-existing conditions, a weakened public option, and a few other
important but limited concessions, the health insurance companies are getting quite a deal. [...]
"During the debate, when the interests of insurance companies would have been effectively challenged, that
challenge was turned back. The 'robust public option' which would have offered a modicum of competition to a
monopolistic industry was whittled down from an initial potential enrollment of 129 million Americans to 6 million.
"An amendment which would have protected the rights of states to pursue single-payer health care was stripped
from the bill at the request of the Administration.
"Looking ahead, we cringe at the prospect of even greater favors for insurance companies.
"Recent rises in unemployment indicate a widening separation between the finance economy and the real
economy. The finance economy considers the health of Wall Street, rising corporate profits, and banks' hoarding
of cash--much of it from taxpayers--as sign of an economic recovery.
"However in the real economy--in which most Americans live--the recession is not over. Rising unemployment,
business failures, bankruptcies and foreclosures are still hammering Main Street.
"This health care bill continues the redistribution of wealth to Wall Street at the expense of America's
manufacturing and service economies which suffer from costs other countries do not have to bear, especially the
cost of health care.
"America continues to stand out among all industrialized nations for its privatized health care system. As a result,
we are less competitive in steel, automotive, aerospace and shipping while other countries subsidize their
exports in these areas through socializing the cost of health care.
"Notwithstanding the fate of H.R. 3962, America will someday come to recognize the broad social and economic
benefits of a not-for-profit, single-payer health care system, which is good for the American people and good for
America's businesses--with of course the notable exceptions being insurance and pharmaceuticals."
Like what you're reading so far? Then why not order a full year (52 issues) of The American Spark
e-newsletter for only $15? A major article covering an story not being told in the Corporate Press will be
delivered to your email every Monday morning for a full year, for less than 30 cents an issue. Order Now!
Kucinich
By Cliff Montgomery - Nov. 9th, 2009
The U.S. House of Representatives late Saturday narrowly passed a massive overhaul of America's health
insurance system.
The Washington Post breathlessly hailed the legislation--called H.R. 3962 on Capitol Hill--as something
which "seeks to...guarantee comprehensive and affordable coverage to almost every American."
But many House members disagree with that assessment--and not all of them are conservatives.
U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) proudly voted against the House proposal. Yesterday, Kucinich
issued a passionate argument for his decision, which all Americans should consider.
The American Spark below offers major portions of Rep. Kucinich's statement:
"We have been led to believe that we must make our health care choices only within the current structure of a
predatory, for-profit insurance system which makes money [by] not providing health care. [...] When health
insurance companies deny care or raise premiums, co-pays and deductibles they are simply trying to make a
profit. That is our system.
"Clearly, the insurance companies are the problem, not the solution. They are driving up the cost of health care.
[...]
"But instead of working toward the elimination of for-profit insurance, H.R. 3962 would put the government in the
role of accelerating the privatization of health care.
"In H.R. 3962, the government is requiring at least 21 million Americans to buy private health insurance from the
very industry that causes costs to be so high, which will result in at least $70 billion in new annual revenue, much
of which is coming from taxpayers.
"This inevitably will lead to even more costs, more subsidies, and higher profits for insurance companies--a
bailout under a blue cross.
"By incurring only a new requirement to cover pre-existing conditions, a weakened public option, and a few other
important but limited concessions, the health insurance companies are getting quite a deal. [...]
"During the debate, when the interests of insurance companies would have been effectively challenged, that
challenge was turned back. The 'robust public option' which would have offered a modicum of competition to a
monopolistic industry was whittled down from an initial potential enrollment of 129 million Americans to 6 million.
"An amendment which would have protected the rights of states to pursue single-payer health care was stripped
from the bill at the request of the Administration.
"Looking ahead, we cringe at the prospect of even greater favors for insurance companies.
"Recent rises in unemployment indicate a widening separation between the finance economy and the real
economy. The finance economy considers the health of Wall Street, rising corporate profits, and banks' hoarding
of cash--much of it from taxpayers--as sign of an economic recovery.
"However in the real economy--in which most Americans live--the recession is not over. Rising unemployment,
business failures, bankruptcies and foreclosures are still hammering Main Street.
"This health care bill continues the redistribution of wealth to Wall Street at the expense of America's
manufacturing and service economies which suffer from costs other countries do not have to bear, especially the
cost of health care.
"America continues to stand out among all industrialized nations for its privatized health care system. As a result,
we are less competitive in steel, automotive, aerospace and shipping while other countries subsidize their
exports in these areas through socializing the cost of health care.
"Notwithstanding the fate of H.R. 3962, America will someday come to recognize the broad social and economic
benefits of a not-for-profit, single-payer health care system, which is good for the American people and good for
America's businesses--with of course the notable exceptions being insurance and pharmaceuticals."
Like what you're reading so far? Then why not order a full year (52 issues) of The American Spark
e-newsletter for only $15? A major article covering an story not being told in the Corporate Press will be
delivered to your email every Monday morning for a full year, for less than 30 cents an issue. Order Now!
Wait, why does an
independent news source
run advertisements? The
Spark answers in its
advertising policy.
independent news source
run advertisements? The
Spark answers in its
advertising policy.
* Please check out our ads--they
help keep this news site running.
Thanks!
help keep this news site running.
Thanks!