Today's Article
The former nuclear
negotiator appears to
single out America,
Germany and France
as being especially
unreasonable toward
Iran.
negotiator appears to
single out America,
Germany and France
as being especially
unreasonable toward
Iran.
The American Spark
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
US Government Pushing Iran In Wrong Direction, Says Nuke Expert
By Cliff Montgomery - Nov. 27th, 2011
The United Nation’s atomic energy agency “has ‘broken the rules’ by publicly releasing a report on Iran's
nuclear program that should have been kept confidential,” an Iranian nuclear expert apparently tells a top U.S.
think-tank.
Seyed Hossein Mousavian is “Iran's former lead nuclear negotiator, and a visiting research scholar at
[Princeton University’s] Woodrow Wilson School's Program on Science and Global Security,” according to a
biographical statement published by the school.
And since Mousavian served as a leading adviser to such Iranian political figures as reformist former President
Mohammad Khatami and moderate former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, his statements carry at least
some weight.
On Nov. 18th, the Bulletin of The Atomic Scientists--a top think-tank which chiefly discusses nuclear weapons
issues--published a very interesting interview with Mousavian on the West’s testy interactions with Iran.
The former nuclear negotiator appears to single out America, Germany and France as being especially
unreasonable toward Iran.
In the interview, Mousavian’s essential point is that “the [released International Atomic Energy Agency, or
IAEA] report represents a step backward in efforts to deal with Iran's nuclear program,” according to the
Bulletin.
To help repair the growing tensions between Iran, the U.S. and the U.N., Mousavian believes the West should
work with Iran on a couple of key issues:
“The IAEA has, unfortunately, broken the rules of the game. Iran does not want to commit the same mistake,”
Mousavian told the Bulletin.
“The issues between the agency and member states should remain confidential,” continued Mousavian. “Yet,
the content of the IAEA reports on Iran are leaked to the media ahead of their distribution among the agency's
member states.”
“This is highly unprofessional and against the statute of the agency,” stated Iran’s former nuclear negotiator.
“Such behavior is highly damaging to the credibility of the IAEA, as an impartial international body.”
“It also clearly demonstrates that the information is dictated to the agency from somewhere else,” stated
Mousavian, “in order to make the case for ratcheting up pressure on Iran.”
“The recent developments constitute another chapter in the long tale of Western miscalculations about Iran,”
pointed out Mousavian. “The West has constantly resorted to escalating pressure on Tehran, without
pondering about the resulting backlash.”
“After the 1979 revolution, Iran sought to shrink the nuclear program and had no intention to have indigenous
uranium enrichment,” declared the former negotiator.
“Nevertheless, the Germans, the French, and the Americans refused to respect their contractual
commitments,” continued Mousavian, and added that those countries “abandoned our unfinished nuclear
projects, rebuffed our demands for compensation, and denied us nuclear fuel.”
“Therefore, Iran had no other option than to take matters into its own hands and aim at self-sufficiency,” he
said.
“This was in no way a unique venture. The West provided Saddam Hussein with chemical and biological
weapons, which he used against Iranians with impunity,” Mousavian pointed out.
“As the first victims of weapons of mass destruction since the Second World War, Iran felt compelled to
develop chemical and biological deterrence capabilities,” he added.
“The same logic applies to Iran's ballistic missile program, which was created to counter Iraq's Western-
supplied long-range missiles,” said Mousavian.
“Therefore, you can trace back the root of Iran's current deterrence capabilities to the sense of solitude that
Tehran experienced during the Iran-Iraq War,” he declared.
“That's why I believe that the West has, inadvertently or not, always pushed Iran in the wrong direction,” added
Mousavian.
Like what you're reading so far? Then why not order a full year (52 issues) of The American Spark
e-newsletter for only $15? A major article covering an story not being told in the Corporate Press will be
delivered to your email every Monday morning for a full year, for less than 30 cents an issue. Order Now!
By Cliff Montgomery - Nov. 27th, 2011
The United Nation’s atomic energy agency “has ‘broken the rules’ by publicly releasing a report on Iran's
nuclear program that should have been kept confidential,” an Iranian nuclear expert apparently tells a top U.S.
think-tank.
Seyed Hossein Mousavian is “Iran's former lead nuclear negotiator, and a visiting research scholar at
[Princeton University’s] Woodrow Wilson School's Program on Science and Global Security,” according to a
biographical statement published by the school.
And since Mousavian served as a leading adviser to such Iranian political figures as reformist former President
Mohammad Khatami and moderate former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, his statements carry at least
some weight.
On Nov. 18th, the Bulletin of The Atomic Scientists--a top think-tank which chiefly discusses nuclear weapons
issues--published a very interesting interview with Mousavian on the West’s testy interactions with Iran.
The former nuclear negotiator appears to single out America, Germany and France as being especially
unreasonable toward Iran.
In the interview, Mousavian’s essential point is that “the [released International Atomic Energy Agency, or
IAEA] report represents a step backward in efforts to deal with Iran's nuclear program,” according to the
Bulletin.
To help repair the growing tensions between Iran, the U.S. and the U.N., Mousavian believes the West should
work with Iran on a couple of key issues:
- Firstly, Germany and the UN Security Council should work toward an agreement that allows Iran the
capacity to enrich uranium, with a proof that such enrichment is solely for peaceful matters;
- Secondly, Iran and the U.S should attempt to honestly--but respectfully--address the “long list of
grievances” which continues to poison all discussion between the two countries.
“The IAEA has, unfortunately, broken the rules of the game. Iran does not want to commit the same mistake,”
Mousavian told the Bulletin.
“The issues between the agency and member states should remain confidential,” continued Mousavian. “Yet,
the content of the IAEA reports on Iran are leaked to the media ahead of their distribution among the agency's
member states.”
“This is highly unprofessional and against the statute of the agency,” stated Iran’s former nuclear negotiator.
“Such behavior is highly damaging to the credibility of the IAEA, as an impartial international body.”
“It also clearly demonstrates that the information is dictated to the agency from somewhere else,” stated
Mousavian, “in order to make the case for ratcheting up pressure on Iran.”
“The recent developments constitute another chapter in the long tale of Western miscalculations about Iran,”
pointed out Mousavian. “The West has constantly resorted to escalating pressure on Tehran, without
pondering about the resulting backlash.”
“After the 1979 revolution, Iran sought to shrink the nuclear program and had no intention to have indigenous
uranium enrichment,” declared the former negotiator.
“Nevertheless, the Germans, the French, and the Americans refused to respect their contractual
commitments,” continued Mousavian, and added that those countries “abandoned our unfinished nuclear
projects, rebuffed our demands for compensation, and denied us nuclear fuel.”
“Therefore, Iran had no other option than to take matters into its own hands and aim at self-sufficiency,” he
said.
“This was in no way a unique venture. The West provided Saddam Hussein with chemical and biological
weapons, which he used against Iranians with impunity,” Mousavian pointed out.
“As the first victims of weapons of mass destruction since the Second World War, Iran felt compelled to
develop chemical and biological deterrence capabilities,” he added.
“The same logic applies to Iran's ballistic missile program, which was created to counter Iraq's Western-
supplied long-range missiles,” said Mousavian.
“Therefore, you can trace back the root of Iran's current deterrence capabilities to the sense of solitude that
Tehran experienced during the Iran-Iraq War,” he declared.
“That's why I believe that the West has, inadvertently or not, always pushed Iran in the wrong direction,” added
Mousavian.
Like what you're reading so far? Then why not order a full year (52 issues) of The American Spark
e-newsletter for only $15? A major article covering an story not being told in the Corporate Press will be
delivered to your email every Monday morning for a full year, for less than 30 cents an issue. Order Now!
Wait, why does an
independent news source
run advertisements? The
Spark answers in its
advertising policy.
independent news source
run advertisements? The
Spark answers in its
advertising policy.
* Please check out our ads--they
help keep this news site running.
Thanks!
help keep this news site running.
Thanks!