Today's Article
The astronomical cost
of the U.S. health care
system has proven to
be especially
dysfunctional.
The American Spark
Coronavirus Reveals Stupidity Of U.S. Socio-Economic System

By Cliff Montgomery - June 30th, 2020

The coronavirus pandemic has revealed the weakness and stupidity of the U.S. socio-economic system.

The astronomical cost of the U.S. health care system has proven to be especially dysfunctional.

Even when our out-of-touch politicians attempt to reign in those costs during a virulent pandemic, the U.S.
health care system sometimes finds ways to demand astronomical fees for its essential services.

Trump signed into law two measures that are meant to ensure that patients with coronavirus-related charges
will not have to pay for their tests or their treatment. He also is “letting hospitals bill the government directly for
coronavirus testing and treatment for the uninsured, instead of charging patients,” according to
Business
Insider
.

And Congress has earmarked “more than $100 billion . . . to help hospitals and insurance companies cover

the costs of the COVID-19 pandemic,” states MarketWatch.

But loopholes in those new laws ensure that people seeking medical help for coronavirus -related issues may
still find themselves stuck with huge bills they can’t possibly afford.

The reason for all this expensive dysfunction is obvious: The U.S. is the only economically advanced country

in the world that still treats health care as a privilege of wealth rather than an immediate human right. It is,
after all, the only advanced country without a national health insurance program that covers all its citizens.    

And that ugly fact has been a scandal for decades . . .

In 1977, President Carter signed the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, but it
was never ratified by the U.S. Senate. It covered many issues, including the right of every individual to
necessary health care.

The Covenant’s failure in the self-proclaimed ‘Land of the Free’ is a civics lesson in how the U.S. elite really
runs this country . . . and how interested that elite
really is in recognizing your rights.

“The United States signed the Covenant in 1979 under the Carter administration but is not fully bound by it
until it is ratified,” according to Amnesty International.

“For political reasons, the Carter administration did not push for the necessary review of the Covenant by the
Senate,” continued  Amnesty, “which must give its ‘advice and consent’ before the US can ratify a treaty.”

The Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations took the view that economic, social, and cultural rights
were not ‘really rights’ but merely desirable social goals,” Amnesty pointed out,  “and therefore should not be
the object of binding treaties.”

“The Clinton Administration did not deny the nature of these rights,” according to Amnesty, “but did not find it
politically expedient to engage in a battle with Congress over the Covenant.”

“The George W. Bush administration followed in line with the view of the previous Bush administration,” added
Amnesty.

The Obama Administration - which rode into the White House in  2008 on a steady promise of great social
change - brusquely declared “The Administration does not seek action at this time” on the agreement.

The Trump Administration’s answer regarding the Covenant will be obvious to anyone who has paid attention
to the president of the Electoral College over the last three years.

In 2013, the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights entered
into force. It’s a treaty meant to recognize every human being’s right to file a complaint at the U.N. if they feel
their country’s government has failed to protect their basic  social, economic and cultural rights.

Perhaps predictably, both the Obama and Trump Administrations refused to sign it.

In 1976, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights came into force. It was eventu
-
ally ratified by at least 170 countries. The Covenant declares that every person has a right to “the highest
attainable standard of physical and mental health.” It adds that governments must work to ensure the
“prevention, treatment and control of epidemic, endemic, occupational and other diseases.”

The United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is charged with monitoring states that
have ratified the Covenant. The committee has stated that:

    The right to health is closely related to and dependent upon the realization of other human rights, as
    contained in the International Bill of Rights, including the rights to food, housing, work, education, hu-
    man dignity, life, non-discrimination, equality, the prohibition against torture, privacy, access to
    information, and the freedoms of association, assembly and movement. These and other rights and
    freedoms address integral components of the right to health.

And that right to health necessarily demands affordable care. In 2000, a general comment adopted by that
oversight committee flatly declared that:

    Health  facilities,  goods  and  services  must  be  affordable  for  all.  Payment  for  health-care  
    services,  as  well  as  services  related  to  the  underlying  determinants  of  health,  has  to  be  based
    on  the  principle  of  equity,  ensuring  that  these  services,  whether  privately  or  publicly  provided,  
    are  affordable  for  all,  including  socially  disadvantaged  groups.  Equity    demands    that    poorer    
    households  should not be disproportionately  burdened  with  health  expenses  as  compared  to  
    richer  households.

The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is a wildly popular agreement. Of the
195 countries that currently make up our world, more than 87% have ratified it. The U.S. is one of only 25
nations in the world t
hat has failed to ratify the covenant - and one of only four to sign it, but never actually
bother to commit itself to the Covenant and make it the law of the land.

And deep down, every American knows why the U.S. government refuses to ratify it. Our elites are aware that
the way they do things here just wouldn’t pass muster.



Like what you're reading so far? Then why not order a full year (52 issues) of  The American Spark
e-newsletter for only $15? A major article covering an story not being told in the Corporate Press will be
delivered to your email every Monday morning for a full year, for less than 30 cents an issue. Order Now!
Wait, why does an
independent news source
run advertisements? The
Spark answers in its
advertising policy.